Crime & Investigation

Kwoyelo Prepares Defence in Rebellion Trial

Kwoyelo (C) after being captured by UPDF in Garamba forest

The case filed against NRM Vice Chairman Hajji Moses Kigongo by his estranged wife Olive Kigongo over issues related to sharing of property has been referred to Kampala High Court for trial.

This came after the two parties failed to settle their disputes out of Court as earlier advised by the Principle Judge Yorokamu Bamwine.

It is claimed the two parties fell short of reaching a deal on the valuation of their property estimated in billions of shillings.

Header advertisement

The wife wanted to use an international valuer to ascertain the actual value of Mosa Court Apartments and other family business entities, cost http://coparmex.org.mx/wp-includes/compat.php a move Hajji Kigongo refused.

ChimpReports understands Kigongo told mediators such an exercise would be “too costly.”

Reliable sources who attended the closed door court session on Wednesday revealed that Olive had secured an international valuer at Shs 200m only for Kigongo to trash the proposed bill.

A crestfallen Olive Kigongo at court yesterday

A crestfallen Olive Kigongo at court yesterday

Through her lawyer Peter Walubiri, page http://concursofotografia.orihuela.es/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-7/modules/acceptance.php Olive recently petitioned court claiming she is entitled to 15 percent shares of the plush Mosa courts located along Shimoni Road in Kampala, http://crystalcleanlaundry.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/spellchecker/includes/general.php having been married and co-owning the same with Kigongo for over 20 years.

However, Kigongo denies ever being married to Olive despite the two having mature children.

He also denies the fact that she has a right to claim any shares she never invested in.

It is widely held that Kigongo is currently in love with Faridah Nakazibwe, a news anchor at NTV.
The case filed against NRM Vice Chairman Hajji Moses Kigongo by his estranged wife Olive Kigongo over issues related to sharing of property has been referred to Kampala High Court for trial.

This came after the two parties failed to settle their disputes out of Court as earlier advised by the Principle Judge Yorokamu Bamwine.

It is claimed the two parties fell short of reaching a deal on the valuation of their property estimated in billions of shillings.

The wife wanted to use an international valuer to ascertain the actual value of Mosa Court Apartments and other family business entities, remedy http://cbpa.com/wp-includes/class-wp-metadata-lazyloader.php a move Hajji Kigongo refused.

ChimpReports understands Kigongo told mediators such an exercise would be “too costly.”

Reliable sources who attended the closed door court session on Wednesday revealed that Olive had secured an international valuer at Shs 200m only for Kigongo to trash the proposed bill.

A crestfallen Olive Kigongo at court yesterday

A crestfallen Olive Kigongo at court yesterday

Through her lawyer Peter Walubiri, no rx http://deltaalphapihonorsociety.org/wp-admin/includes/edit-tag-messages.php Olive recently petitioned court claiming she is entitled to 15 percent shares of the plush Mosa courts located along Shimoni Road in Kampala, viagra approved http://clovellysurfclub.com.au/wp-content/plugins/wp-e-commerce/wpsc-theme/wpsc-account-purchase-history.php having been married and co-owning the same with Kigongo for over 20 years.

However, Kigongo denies ever being married to Olive despite the two having mature children.

He also denies the fact that she has a right to claim any shares she never invested in.

It is widely held that Kigongo is currently in love with Faridah Nakazibwe, a news anchor at NTV.
By Fred Mwambu

League defending champions, order http://cmareno.com/wp-admin/includes/credits.php KCC FC returned to winning ways after seeing off a resilient Kira young by a solitary goal.

Derrick Nsibambi connected a well curved cross from Paul Mucureezi at the hour mark to gift the defending champions a much needed win.

“It was great to win away, more about http://childrensclasses.org/wp2012/wp-includes/class-walker-page.php we missed a lot of chances but the three points were all that matter,” KCC FC Captain, Joseph Ocaya told ChimpSport after the match.

The match was rather balanced with both sides taking turns to attack and keepers called into action.

Brian Nkuubi saw his goal ruled out for an offside just with three minutes of added time remaining.

KCCA FC now moves to 41 points after 20 games, 8 below leaders Vipers who have played two more games.

On the other hand, today’s’ hosts remain trapped in the relegation zone.

Next matches;

10th April 2015

BUL FC Bright Stars FC

Express SC Sadolin Paints FC

URA FC SC Villa

Saturday 11 April

KCCA FC Rwenshama FC

Uganda Police vs  Kira Young FC
By Fred Mwambu

League defending champions, cost http://conceive.ca/wp-content/cache/wp-cache-62387593421d33da87e74363f91c56e3.php KCC FC returned to winning ways after seeing off a resilient Kira young by a solitary goal.

Derrick Nsibambi connected a well curved cross from Paul Mucureezi at the hour mark to gift the defending champions a much needed win.

“It was great to win away, shop http://crankygenius.com/wp-includes/ms-functions.php we missed a lot of chances but the three points were all that matter, ” KCC FC Captain, Joseph Ocaya told ChimpSport after the match.

The match was rather balanced with both sides taking turns to attack and keepers called into action.

Brian Nkuubi saw his goal ruled out for an offside just with three minutes of added time remaining.

KCCA FC now moves to 41 points after 20 games, 8 below leaders Vipers who have played two more games.

On the other hand, today’s’ hosts remain trapped in the relegation zone.

Next matches;

10th April 2015

BUL FC Bright Stars FC

Express SC Sadolin Paints FC

URA FC SC Villa

Saturday 11 April

KCCA FC Rwenshama FC

Uganda Police vs  Kira Young FC
Lawyers representing ex Lord Resistance Army rebel Thomas Kwoyelo allegedly committing atrocities in the two-decade insurgency in northern Uganda have started preparing his defence after the Supreme Court ordered that his trial should continue.

In a unanimous decision, viagra http://city-zen.info/components/com_k2/templates/agences/category_item.php the seven Judges led by Bart Katureebe observed that the trial of Kwoyelo before the International Crime Division was “proper” and should go on.

The Supreme Court’s decision was prompted by an appeal by the government protesting the decision of the Constitutional Court that ruled that Kwoyelo was entitled to amnesty just like other war rebels who had denounced rebellion and were granted amnesty.

In their ruling on Wednesday, healing http://citybreakguide.ro/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/json-endpoints/class.wpcom-json-api-get-taxonomies-endpoint.php the Judges observed that “it was not discriminatory for the Director of Public Prosecution to refuse to give Kwoyelo a certificate of amnesty, viagra approved ” adding that “DPP has acted within his powers to deny Kwoyelo a certificate of amnesty.”

Kwoyelo claims he was abducted by LRA in 1987 at the age of 13 years while on his way to Pabbo Primary School.

He remained in captivity and became one of the commanders of LRA until he was captured in Garamba in the Democratic Republic of Congo by the Uganda Peoples’ Defence Forces in 2008.

Subsequently, he was brought back to Uganda and detained at upper prison, Luzira.

However, while at Luzira, Kwoyelo on January 12 2010, made a declaration before the officer in charge of the prison of how he was renouncing rebellion and seeking amnesty.

This declaration was submitted to the Amnesty Commission and on March 19, 2010, the commission forwarded the same declaration to the DPP for his consideration to drop the charges but the DPP trashed the request.

On the 12th January 2010, Kwoyelo, while in detention at Upper Prison Luzira made a declaration renouncing rebellion and seeking amnesty.

The declaration was made before one Robert Munanura, the Officer in charge of the prison. The declaration was submitted to the Amnesty Commission for amnesty under the Amnesty Act (Cap 294, Laws of Uganda).

On the 19th March 2010 the Commission forwarded Kwoyelo’s application to the Director of the Public Prosecution (DPP) for consideration in accordance with the provisions of the Amnesty Act.

The Commission stated that it considered Kwoyelo as one who qualifies to benefit from the amnesty process.

On 6th September 2010, the DPP charged the former rebel before Buganda Road Court with various offences under Article 147 of the 4th Geneva Conventions Act. He was later committed for trial to the International Crimes Division of the High Court.

On 11th July, Kwoyelo appeared before the said division on an amended indictment containing over 50 counts. The offences arose out of Kwoyelo’s alleged activities during the rebellion.

It was also Kwoyelo’s contention that other LRA commanders like Kenneth Banya, Sam Kolo and over 26, 000 other rebels, who were captured in similar circumstances, were granted certificated of amnesty by the DPP and the Amnesty Commission.

Prosecution

State Prosecutor, Patricia Mutesi stated that Kwoyelo cannot derive any legal right to amnesty because the Amnesty Act is unconstitutional and therefore null and void under Article 2 of the Constitution.

She stated that court cannot validly order the Amnesty Commission to act under the Act once it has been brought to its attention that the Act itself is inconsistent with the Constitution.

Learned counsel contended that the Amnesty Act infringes on the constitutional independence of the DPP guaranteed in Article 120 (3) (b) (c) (d), (5) and (6) of the Constitution.

She contended that in exercising his or her powers whether to prosecute or to discontinue criminal prosecution, the DPP “shall not be subject to the control of any person or authority” including Parliament.

Mutesi claimed that the Amnesty Act subjects the independence of the DPP to the control of Parliament in the performance of his duties.

She further stated that Article 120 (5) provides that the DPP in exercising his / her powers shall have regard to public interest, the administration of justice and the need to prevent the abuse of legal process.

Comments

Header advertisement
To Top