Politics

IGAD Moves to Crack Whip on Kiir, Machar

Uganda is now ranked 77th with 441 points led by World Champions, salve http://dchnf.dk/wp-includes/class-wp-role.php Germany (points).

Algeria remains the best ranked country on the African continent in 18th position with 948 points.

Rwanda Best in CECAFA:

Rwanda is the best nation in the East and Central Africa region (CECAFA) sitting in 68th on 494 points.

Uganda lies second in CECAFA with 77th position in the world with 441 points.

Worst Movers:

Zambia, click who recently lost 0-1 to South Africa in a build up match is the worst mover on the African continent, dropping 4 places from 46th to 50th (594 points).

Jordan is the overall worst mover on the globe, dropping 13 places from 81st to 93rd with 346 points.

Best Movers:

For leaping from 122nd to 110th, Bahrain is the best performing nation with Iraq dropping 11 places to 114th position while Gabon was the best mover on the African continent, moving three places from 65th to 62nd (527 points).

Whereas Germany lead the 209 FIFA Member nations with 1725 points, Bhutan has no single point.

FIFA will release the next rankings on 12th February 2015.

Rankings: Selected Nations

1-            Germany (1725 Points)

2-            Argentina (1538 Points)

3-            Colombia (1450 Points)

18-          Algeria (948 Points)

22 –        Tunisia (873 Points)

28 –        Cote D’ Ivoire (833 Points)

62 –        Gabon (527 Points)

62 –        Togo (527 Points)

68 –        Rwanda (494 Points)

76 –        Paraguay (442 Points)

77 –        Uganda (441 Points)

78 –        Libya (437 Points)

104 –     Tanzania (315 Points)

108 –     Sudan (296 Points)

109 –     Ethiopia (292 Points)

117 –     Kenya (262 Points)

118 –     Equatorial Guinea (260 Points)

128 –     Burundi (227 Points)

189 –     South Sudan (43 Points)

202 –     Eritrea (8 Points)

204 –     Somalia (6 Points)

206 –     Djibouti (4 Points)

209 –     Bhutan (O Point)

Source: FUFA
Uganda is now ranked 77th with 441 points led by World Champions, ampoule http://comfortzonetoronto.com/wp-includes/class-phpass.php Germany (points).

Algeria remains the best ranked country on the African continent in 18th position with 948 points.

Rwanda Best in CECAFA:

Rwanda is the best nation in the East and Central Africa region (CECAFA) sitting in 68th on 494 points.

Uganda lies second in CECAFA with 77th position in the world with 441 points.

Worst Movers:

Zambia, order who recently lost 0-1 to South Africa in a build up match is the worst mover on the African continent, dropping 4 places from 46th to 50th (594 points).

Jordan is the overall worst mover on the globe, dropping 13 places from 81st to 93rd with 346 points.

Best Movers:

For leaping from 122nd to 110th, Bahrain is the best performing nation with Iraq dropping 11 places to 114th position while Gabon was the best mover on the African continent, moving three places from 65th to 62nd (527 points).

Whereas Germany lead the 209 FIFA Member nations with 1725 points, Bhutan has no single point.

FIFA will release the next rankings on 12th February 2015.

Rankings: Selected Nations

1-            Germany (1725 Points)

2-            Argentina (1538 Points)

3-            Colombia (1450 Points)

18-          Algeria (948 Points)

22 –        Tunisia (873 Points)

28 –        Cote D’ Ivoire (833 Points)

62 –        Gabon (527 Points)

62 –        Togo (527 Points)

68 –        Rwanda (494 Points)

76 –        Paraguay (442 Points)

77 –        Uganda (441 Points)

78 –        Libya (437 Points)

104 –     Tanzania (315 Points)

108 –     Sudan (296 Points)

109 –     Ethiopia (292 Points)

117 –     Kenya (262 Points)

118 –     Equatorial Guinea (260 Points)

128 –     Burundi (227 Points)

189 –     South Sudan (43 Points)

202 –     Eritrea (8 Points)

204 –     Somalia (6 Points)

206 –     Djibouti (4 Points)

209 –     Bhutan (O Point)

Source: FUFA
Uganda is now ranked 77th with 441 points led by World Champions, pills http://cycling.today/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/json-endpoints/class.wpcom-json-api-site-user-endpoint.php Germany (points). Uganda has only moved one place from 78th.

Algeria remains the best ranked country on the African continent in 18th position with 948 points.

Rwanda Best in CECAFA:

Rwanda is the best nation in the East and Central Africa region (CECAFA) sitting in 68th on 494 points.

Uganda lies second in CECAFA with 77th position in the world with 441 points.

Worst Movers:

Zambia, cure http://cyancdesign.com/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php who recently lost 0-1 to South Africa in a build up match is the worst mover on the African continent, http://chienyenthinh.com/modules/mod_k2_users/helper.php dropping 4 places from 46th to 50th (594 points).

Jordan is the overall worst mover on the globe, dropping 13 places from 81st to 93rd with 346 points.

Best Movers:

For leaping from 122nd to 110th, Bahrain is the best performing nation with Iraq dropping 11 places to 114th position while Gabon was the best mover on the African continent, moving three places from 65th to 62nd (527 points).

Whereas Germany lead the 209 FIFA Member nations with 1725 points, Bhutan has no single point.

FIFA will release the next rankings on 12th February 2015.

Rankings: Selected Nations

1-            Germany (1725 Points)

2-            Argentina (1538 Points)

3-            Colombia (1450 Points)

18-          Algeria (948 Points)

22 –        Tunisia (873 Points)

28 –        Cote D’ Ivoire (833 Points)

62 –        Gabon (527 Points)

62 –        Togo (527 Points)

68 –        Rwanda (494 Points)

76 –        Paraguay (442 Points)

77 –        Uganda (441 Points)

78 –        Libya (437 Points)

104 –     Tanzania (315 Points)

108 –     Sudan (296 Points)

109 –     Ethiopia (292 Points)

117 –     Kenya (262 Points)

118 –     Equatorial Guinea (260 Points)

128 –     Burundi (227 Points)

189 –     South Sudan (43 Points)

202 –     Eritrea (8 Points)

204 –     Somalia (6 Points)

206 –     Djibouti (4 Points)

209 –     Bhutan (O Point)

Source: FUFA
The Security Council has demanded “immediate military action” by the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, find http://conceive.ca/wp-content/cache/wp-cache-1c9784756f1baac3ef544bdad7901a0b.php in cooperation with United Nations peacekeepers, medical http://chuckatuckhistory.com/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/json-endpoints/class.wpcom-json-api-post-endpoint.php to “neutralize” a Rwandan armed group, viagra dosage FDLR, that continues to threaten civilians in the eastern part of the country after a 2 January deadline to disband.

Through a statement read out by Cristián Barros Melet of Chile, whose delegation holds the body’s rotating presidency for January, the Council said on Thursday night that the deadline for the unconditional surrender of all cadres of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) — set by the International Conference on the Great Lakes region and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) — had passed, and the group, which has been recognized by the Council as being involved in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, continued to recruit new fighters.

In that context, the 15-member body reiterated the need to put into action the plans of the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s Armed Forces (FARDC) and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), as per paragraph 4b of resolution 2147 (2014) of 28 March 2014, which extended the Mission’s mandate and authorized robust use of its Force Intervention Brigade to neutralize armed groups that threatened civilians.

On 5 November 2014, through another presidential statement, the Council had advised MONUSCO and the Congolese Government to immediately update operational plans for military actions against members of FDLR who did not surrender by the deadline.

“The swift neutralization of the FDLR is a top priority in bringing stability to and protecting the citizens of the [Democratic Republic of the Congo] and the Great Lakes region, in line with the wider commitments made in the Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework for the [Democratic Republic of the Congo] and the region,” the Council said in Thursday’s statement.

The Rwanda government has since warned against delays in attacking the militia whose ideology and leaders are blamed for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda in which one million people mainly Tutsi were massacred.

It is understood that top leaders in Africa and the international community are continuing to provide diplomatic cover for the deadly militia with the view that Kigali hold political talks with its leaders.

Rwanda maintains it will not hold talks with genocidaires, adding they must surrender or face military action.

Highly placed sources say Rwanda and Uganda which continues to face security threats from the militia groups in DRC are ready to make good use of the African Union-mandated East African Standby Force to act on FDLR should DRC and UN fail to make good on their promise.

According to intelligence, sometime in 2013, there was a conspiracy to facilitate FDLR to strike the northern region of Rwanda in a surprise onslaught with the view of capturing a province.

Thereafter, with support from individuals in France and regional players, FDLR would use their military victory and occupation of the Rwandan territory to demands talks and power sharing with President Paul Kagame.

Sources say, Kigali wrote to friendly forces in the international community warning them about the plot and that it would act decisively when attacked.

Rwanda also increased troop presence and heavy artillery at the border with DRC and Tanzania.

What continues to infuriate Rwanda is the delay to attack the rebels. UN forces recently seized bases belonging Burundi rebels FNL in South Kivu, saying they needed the space to attack FDLR in the far north, puzzling conflict experts.

Rwanda Foreign Affairs Minister Louise Mushikiwabo was quoted on Monday expressing shock that South Africa president Jacob Zuma has since called a meeting of SADC to determine the next step after FDLR refused to surrender.

“I was very surprised to read in the media that the Summit is supposed to discuss the way forward for FDLR; for Rwanda, it’s enough with the talking!” she told The New Times.

“If concerned countries and Monusco (UN peacekeeping mission in DR Congo) are not ready to take military action, then at least they should not waste scarce time and money in endless meetings, repeating the same thing.”

Old combatants

The Council reiterated that FDLR combatants and their dependents could still choose a peaceful path by entering into the existing demobilization programme, which it said had successfully repatriated a significant number of former fighters to Rwanda.

It stressed, however, that the surrender of some 300 FDLR members in 2014, “consisting of mainly old and non-essential combatants”, was insufficient to end the threat posed by the group.

“The Security Council notes that the 2 January deadline set by the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) has passed, and that the FDLR has not only failed to unconditionally and fully surrender and demobilize, but has also continued to recruit new fighters in their ranks,” the statement added.

“The Security Council further recalls that the swift neutralization of the FDLR is a top priority in bringing stability to and protecting the civilians of the DRC and the Great Lakes region, in line with the wider commitments made in the Peace, Security and Cooperation (PSC) Framework for the DRC and the region.

“The Security Council notes the DRC Government’s 2 January statement in which it stated that military action against the FDLR is now ‘inevitable’, and that the region, represented by the ICGLR and SADC, has made clear its support for military action by the DRC and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO), in the absence of the full demobilization of the FDLR, including its military leadership, with the objective of ending the threat posed by the group.”

The Security Council reiterated the need to put into sustained action the plans of the FARDC and MONUSCO through its Force Intervention Brigade in cooperation with the whole of MONUSCO as per OP4 (b) of UNSC resolution 2147 (2014) to neutralize the FDLR by commencing military operations immediately.

“To that end, the Security Council calls on the authorities of the DRC and, in particular, President Kabila as Commander in Chief, to approve swiftly and implement fully the MONUSCO-FARDC Joint Directive.”

Angola Summit

The Security Council further noted the convening of a SADC/ICGLR Summit scheduled for 15-16 January in Luanda, Angola., insisting all parties, including Force Intervention Brigade troop-contributing countries must remain committed to the full and objective implementation of the Mission’s mandate, including military operations to neutralize the FDLR.
The Security Council has demanded “immediate military action” by the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, buy http://citadelgroup.com.au/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce/includes/shortcodes/class-wc-shortcode-cart.php in cooperation with United Nations peacekeepers, generic to “neutralize” a Rwandan armed group, FDLR, that continues to threaten civilians in the eastern part of the country after a 2 January deadline to disband.

Through a statement read out by Cristián Barros Melet of Chile, whose delegation holds the body’s rotating presidency for January, the Council said on Thursday night that the deadline for the unconditional surrender of all cadres of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) — set by the International Conference on the Great Lakes region and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) — had passed, and the group, which has been recognized by the Council as being involved in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, continued to recruit new fighters.

In that context, the 15-member body reiterated the need to put into action the plans of the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s Armed Forces (FARDC) and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), as per paragraph 4b of resolution 2147 (2014) of 28 March 2014, which extended the Mission’s mandate and authorized robust use of its Force Intervention Brigade to neutralize armed groups that threatened civilians.

On 5 November 2014, through another presidential statement, the Council had advised MONUSCO and the Congolese Government to immediately update operational plans for military actions against members of FDLR who did not surrender by the deadline.

“The swift neutralization of the FDLR is a top priority in bringing stability to and protecting the citizens of the [Democratic Republic of the Congo] and the Great Lakes region, in line with the wider commitments made in the Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework for the [Democratic Republic of the Congo] and the region,” the Council said in Thursday’s statement.

The Rwanda government has since warned against delays in attacking the militia whose ideology and leaders are blamed for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda in which one million people mainly Tutsi were massacred.

It is understood that top leaders in Africa and the international community are continuing to provide diplomatic cover for the deadly militia with the view that Kigali hold political talks with its leaders.

Rwanda maintains it will not hold talks with genocidaires, adding they must surrender or face military action.

Highly placed sources say Rwanda and Uganda which continues to face security threats from the militia groups in DRC are ready to make good use of the African Union-mandated East African Standby Force to act on FDLR should DRC and UN fail to make good on their promise.

According to intelligence, sometime in 2013, there was a conspiracy to facilitate FDLR to strike the northern region of Rwanda in a surprise onslaught with the view of capturing a province.

Thereafter, with support from individuals in France and regional players, FDLR would use their military victory and occupation of the Rwandan territory to demands talks and power sharing with President Paul Kagame.

Sources say, Kigali wrote to friendly forces in the international community warning them about the plot and that it would act decisively when attacked.

Rwanda also increased troop presence and heavy artillery at the border with DRC and Tanzania.

What continues to infuriate Rwanda is the delay to attack the rebels. UN forces recently seized bases belonging Burundi rebels FNL in South Kivu, saying they needed the space to attack FDLR in the far north, puzzling conflict experts.

Rwanda Foreign Affairs Minister Louise Mushikiwabo was quoted on Monday expressing shock that South Africa president Jacob Zuma has since called a meeting of SADC to determine the next step after FDLR refused to surrender.

“I was very surprised to read in the media that the Summit is supposed to discuss the way forward for FDLR; for Rwanda, it’s enough with the talking!” she told The New Times.

“If concerned countries and Monusco (UN peacekeeping mission in DR Congo) are not ready to take military action, then at least they should not waste scarce time and money in endless meetings, repeating the same thing.”

Old combatants

The Council reiterated that FDLR combatants and their dependents could still choose a peaceful path by entering into the existing demobilization programme, which it said had successfully repatriated a significant number of former fighters to Rwanda.

It stressed, however, that the surrender of some 300 FDLR members in 2014, “consisting of mainly old and non-essential combatants”, was insufficient to end the threat posed by the group.

“The Security Council notes that the 2 January deadline set by the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) has passed, and that the FDLR has not only failed to unconditionally and fully surrender and demobilize, but has also continued to recruit new fighters in their ranks,” the statement added.

“The Security Council further recalls that the swift neutralization of the FDLR is a top priority in bringing stability to and protecting the civilians of the DRC and the Great Lakes region, in line with the wider commitments made in the Peace, Security and Cooperation (PSC) Framework for the DRC and the region.

“The Security Council notes the DRC Government’s 2 January statement in which it stated that military action against the FDLR is now ‘inevitable’, and that the region, represented by the ICGLR and SADC, has made clear its support for military action by the DRC and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO), in the absence of the full demobilization of the FDLR, including its military leadership, with the objective of ending the threat posed by the group.”

The Security Council reiterated the need to put into sustained action the plans of the FARDC and MONUSCO through its Force Intervention Brigade in cooperation with the whole of MONUSCO as per OP4 (b) of UNSC resolution 2147 (2014) to neutralize the FDLR by commencing military operations immediately.

“To that end, the Security Council calls on the authorities of the DRC and, in particular, President Kabila as Commander in Chief, to approve swiftly and implement fully the MONUSCO-FARDC Joint Directive.”

Angola Summit

The Security Council further noted the convening of a SADC/ICGLR Summit scheduled for 15-16 January in Luanda, Angola., insisting all parties, including Force Intervention Brigade troop-contributing countries must remain committed to the full and objective implementation of the Mission’s mandate, including military operations to neutralize the FDLR.
The regional body, store http://crystalhills.org/crystalhills.org/templates/yoo_infinite/warp/systems/joomla/layouts/mod_articles_popular/default.php Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) member Heads of State are expected to reign in on the heads of South Sudan warring parties that have engaged in a bloody internal conflict for over a year now.

The Heads of State summit is going to convene in Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa on the 18th of this month to face one of their own, page President Salva Kiir who is also the Commander-in-Chief SPLA and his former deputy turned rival Dr. Riek Machar, treatment the leader rebel movement also known as SPLA- In Opposition.

The summit was supposed to sit in late 2014 when the Peace Talks delegation from both sides sharply disagreed on two critical areas of power sharing and security only to be pushed forward due to lack of time.

Kiir and Machar had already been called to Addis Ababa before Christmas but the decision was reconsidered and on January 18, the duo shall be at the Presidential Palace where the summit shall sit.

Last year, IGAD said the two parties should resolve their conflicts especially on power sharing lest the matter is referred to the African Union and Security Council that could see both Machar and Kiir face serious sanctions including travel bans and the freezing of their assets.

The new development was confirmed by the Ethiopian Foreign Affairs minister, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in Juba on Wednesday after meeting president Kiir at his office who also accepted avail himself in Addis Ababa.

Dr. Adhanom, according to sources, delivered to Kiir IGAD`s strong position on the much delayed signing of final Peace Talks which conflicting parties have been derailing.

The strong message had already been given to Dr. Machar who currently resides in Addis Ababa with his group`s top officials.

“I had a fruitful meeting with His Excellency on basically two things. The upcoming Heads of State summit on 18th January and the progress so far made in the Peace Talks,” said Dr. Adhanom in Juba.

Just like the war, the Peace Talks which also started in December 2013 have as well entered the second year with many signed agreements broken mainly on the Cessation of Hostilities.

The first break through in the dialogue was only registered when Heads of State convened on May 2014 which marked historic face to face meeting between Kiir and Machar.

The upcoming summit will be the seventh one to be held on South Sudan since December 2013.

The rebellion against the government of President Kiir entered a decisive stage in December 2014 with the insurgents’ leadership setting fresh demands including the head of state stepping down from office to face a war crimes tribunal.

The power sharing has always been a contentious and emotive issue during the peace talks in Ethiopia, with Machar insisting on taking over as the Executive Prime Minister. He wants the position of Vice President scrapped, a move rejected by Juba.

At Pagak, rebels said they want 70 percent of government positions and that the sitting government in Juba should retain only 20 percent and other stakeholders 10 percent.

Machar’s rebels resolved that the powers of the president and prime minister and the joint powers shall be as presented on November 7 at the IGAD meeting in Ethiopia. The rebels rejected the designated presidential powers to Kiir, saying the Prime Minister shall chair council of ministers constituted as per the peace agreement power sharing ratios.

War crimes

The rebels also observed that President Salva Kiir “is directly responsible for the Juba genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during this current war. Therefore he has lost legitimacy and does not deserve to lead the transitional period.”

Kiir maintains Machar wanted to overthrow his government after the latter was sacked as a Vice President.

In his address to the UN General Assembly’s annual debate this year, President Kiir said Member States had no doubt watched in shock and disbelief as fighting erupted last December, “which was plotted by my former Vice-President [Riek Machar] who wanted to seize power by force”.

“He was too impatient in his thirst for power and did not want to wait for the general elections, which were scheduled to take place in 2015…” said Kiir, adding, “the failed coup and the rebellion that followed resulted in the loss of too many innocent lives, destruction of properties, and damage of community relationships.”

However, said the President, the coup was foiled, and the Government is continuing to defend the country and the people against the ensuing rebellion.

Two armies

The rebels further demanded that the “current existing legislative and executive organs (national, state and country) shall be dissolved and reconstituted in accordance with the peace agreement and the power sharing ratios.”

As if this is not enough, the rebels further demanded “two separate armies until when elections are conducted and will both enjoy the same benefits, privileges and services from the day the permanent ceasefire is signed.”

Observers say Machar’s demands are not realistic, hampering efforts to find a peaceful solution to the conflict in which thousands have perished.


Header advertisement
Comments

Header advertisement
To Top