Features

Acute Hunger Hits Somalia Again

Girls herding goats in Somalia where in certain areas drought has contributed to severe water shortages and livestock deaths. Photo: FAO/Simon Maina

uk essay writing service uk essay writing service uk essay writing service uk essay writing service P. Words That Show Anxiety A narrative uk essay writing service that is scary requires her sensibilities were terrified out-of by a character. Information is among the four main forms of discussion, site http://christchurchcathedral.org.au/wp-includes/general-template.php based on Mark Grambs “The Describers Dictionary.” When writing scary experiences, use a thesaurus or additional language research book to boost your explanation of occasions, locations and heroes. A drink or item of food can taste ” poisonous, ” ” fetid, ” “foul” or “rancid.” Items could experience “slimy” or ” grimy. A powerful writer may deliver indicators towards the audience that the narrative is going to be alarming and dismal utilizing such terminology as “gloomy,” “somber,” “dreary,” “forbidding” and “weird.” You can also ascribe terrifying features to inanimate things to heighten the feeling. A spot may exude an “acrid,” “smelly” or “choking” smell. Lovecraft, a popular American horror author, wrote that ” the strongest form of fear is fear of the unfamiliar.” Worry in a reader cans increase by not giving away every depth of spider a monster or location.

Once the focus is on levels pupils are far more likely to cheat.

Utilize colors such as “pitch-black” and “ebony” to explain items that are dim. Phrases like “horrified,” “horror-struck,” “petrified,” “panic-stricken,” “appalled,” “witless” and “aghast” is going to do; nevertheless, addressing the indicators of the characteris fears are even better. The character can notice odd “clanking” sounds, or possibly uk essay writing service a intimidating figure can chat in a “dark,” “steely,” “sepulchral,” “sibilant” or uk essay writing service “guttural” style. Unclear explanations, such “an amorphous creature,” “hazy air,” “opaque waters,” “tenebrous valley” or “unintelligible sound” create a disturbingly different environment for that viewer. Structures could seem “overwhelming,” and a forest could search “scary.” Words That Evoke the Five Senses An account is even scarier when visitors can easily see, hear, feel, style and aroma points inside the tale. ” Words That Increase Suspense uk essay writing service H.

You’re not advised to create a summary while the subtext have to be within an evaluation form.

Words That Set uk essay writing service the Feeling An eerie environment right is established by a tale that buy an essay is truly scary from the beginning. The more intriguing your vocabulary, the higher your viewers will have the ability to assume themselves while in the story.

 

By Morrison Rwakakamba

I have listened repeatedly on various media platforms, case http://celstec.biz/wp-includes/class.wp-scripts.php a grand claim by Mr Odrek Rwabwogo, ask http://cirgroup.com/typo3conf/ext/crawler/cli/class.tx_crawler_cli.php one of National Resistance Movement’s (NRM’s) contestants to Central Executive Committee (CEC) for the position of Vice Chairman Western Region.

He argues that, sick the problem with governance in Uganda, and particularly within the NRM, is that leaders don’t understand ideology. On one instance, he specifically states that leaders come out of universities and partake of national leadership without being schooled in NRM ideology.

Mr Rwabwogo’s claim points to logic that, all challenges we face in this country emanate from ideological undernourishment. That indeed is his solemn opinion and like all of us, he has full rights to his views.

Although he pushes this opinion with some measure of humility, I find the claim generalistic, sweeping, and dismissive of efforts that NRM leaders and supporters at every level have, since the 1970’s, invested to explain to, train and retool citizenry in foundational ideals and principles of the NRM.

This claim also diminishes and objectifies millions of NRM supporters who have over the years continued to vote the NRM massively because of its ability to articulate its ideology and program of action with clarity.

The NRM Chairman, H.E President Yoweri Museveni is the grandmaster ideologue of NRM. He has been and remains the most articulate, simple and audible voice of NRM’s ideological evangelism. He has written extensively on the subject, spoken clearly and broadly on the subject, trained and retooled leaders both in Uganda and the rest of Africa.

For about four decades, the NRM has simplified the concept of its ideology as ‘the sum total of both the diagnosis of societal problems and the prescription for their cure’. After protracted discussions and many years of scrutiny, NRM agreed on two targets as anchors of its ideology, i.e. Prosperity and Security.

This was a clear prescription after an accurate diagnosis of Uganda’s disease, and through NRM actions, Uganda has been largely vaccinated from the element of insecurity.

Prosperity

The second target of prosperity remains mostly work in progress. Prosperity is the singular most important goal of NRM ideology. It is embedded and other elements like democracy, nationalism, socio-economic transformation, non-sectarianism, security of person and property and pan Africanism are aimed at achieving prosperity for all Ugandans.

Prosperity means that each of our individual families has sufficient income to live a good life, the family members are educated, healthy and optimistic about their future. Looking at a catalogue of Uganda’s human development reports, indicators, targets and other datasets, Uganda is on a clear pathway to prosperity.

Admittedly, more needs to be done and I understand the impatience, cynicism and criticism related to pace and speed at which NRM is delivering on prosperity.

For example it is clear that sustained economic growth of over 6 percent per annum-one of the highest in the world- is important but insufficient for Uganda’s total prosperity. NRM leaders must lead debate on what kind of growth we want to achieve as a country in the coming years.

We now largely have ruthless growth (unequal economic growth that provides prosperity to a few); we clearly have jobless growth (an economy expanding but creating less and less jobs for thousands of graduates, with attendant mismatch of skills).

We also see rootless growth (economic growth that is largely devoid of context and circumstances of different communities. What works for Amudat district may not work for Rukungiri district). We mostly have voiceless growth (growth that is less participatory but mostly technocratic and driven at Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development with veneer elaborate budget consultative documents and policies that rarely deliver on citizenry voice).

The foregoing are very much tactical challenges. The strategic element of ideology and ideological clarity was resolved under the leadership of NRM Chairman H.E Yoweri K. Museveni. Tactical issues deal with implementation under operational institutions of Government.

I would have been fascinated if our prospective leaders in NRM were demonstrating resolute and principled willingness to debate transformative tactical issues like how to build a knowledge economy; what kind of reforms we need in the education and social sectors to build agile human resources and personbytes necessary to shape and re-imagine the future.

Is NRM ready to concretely discuss healthcare reforms necessary to expand life expectancy from the current 59 years to 85 years in the next 25 years? Are we ready to discuss restructuring of government to make it more effective?

Is broad based government still a relevant concept – or should the focus be on competitiveness of Ugandans wherever they come from? Should we still be districting and redistricting and thus creating permanent recurrent costs that pry off resources from productive sectors of the economy? These are some of the issues we should be discussing and not fuzzy revisionism of ideology and singular claims on projects like the Youth Livelihood program and Youth Venture Capital scheme that are yet to be evaluated.

We must honestly debate and act on these issues within a delivery mechanism and framework that embeds human rights, integrity, gender equality, dignity for citizenry, and the planet. We have to be bold and discuss practical challenges that inspire hard work and getting things done “for God and my country” not “for me”.

Deliver ideology

The campaign we need is not to teach ideology per se – but to deliver the ideology.  I wish Mr. Rwabwogo the best, but to appear to recreate or tweak NRM ideology with brazen talk of how issues and generation has evolved is pure subterfuge, diversionary and pretentious.

The generations of yesterday, today and the future aspire and deservedly so, to a life of total security, dignity and prosperity – and the NRM ideology has never deviated from that.

Leadership is diagnostic and about tackling difficult problems. We must put citizenry, country and our political organization first.

Morrison Rwakakamba

NRM Card holding Member, Nyamubogore Village, Nyeibingo Parish, Kebisoni Sub County, Rukungiri District.
 

By Morrison Rwakakamba

I have listened repeatedly on various media platforms, thumb http://cloud.ca/wp-includes/taxonomy.php a grand claim by Mr Odrek Rwabwogo, visit this site http://chasingjamesbeard.com/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modules/random-redirect.php one of National Resistance Movement’s (NRM’s) contestants to Central Executive Committee (CEC) for the position of Vice Chairman Western Region.

He argues that, the problem with governance in Uganda, and particularly within the NRM, is that leaders don’t understand ideology. On one instance, he specifically states that leaders come out of universities and partake of national leadership without being schooled in NRM ideology.

Mr Rwabwogo’s claim points to logic that, all challenges we face in this country emanate from ideological undernourishment. That indeed is his solemn opinion and like all of us, he has full rights to his views.

Although he pushes this opinion with some measure of humility, I find the claim generalistic, sweeping, and dismissive of efforts that NRM leaders and supporters at every level have, since the 1970’s, invested to explain to, train and retool citizenry in foundational ideals and principles of the NRM.

This claim also diminishes and objectifies millions of NRM supporters who have over the years continued to vote the NRM massively because of its ability to articulate its ideology and program of action with clarity.

The NRM Chairman, H.E President Yoweri Museveni is the grandmaster ideologue of NRM. He has been and remains the most articulate, simple and audible voice of NRM’s ideological evangelism. He has written extensively on the subject, spoken clearly and broadly on the subject, trained and retooled leaders both in Uganda and the rest of Africa.

For about four decades, the NRM has simplified the concept of its ideology as ‘the sum total of both the diagnosis of societal problems and the prescription for their cure’. After protracted discussions and many years of scrutiny, NRM agreed on two targets as anchors of its ideology, i.e. Prosperity and Security.

This was a clear prescription after an accurate diagnosis of Uganda’s disease, and through NRM actions, Uganda has been largely vaccinated from the element of insecurity.

Prosperity

The second target of prosperity remains mostly work in progress. Prosperity is the singular most important goal of NRM ideology. It is embedded and other elements like democracy, nationalism, socio-economic transformation, non-sectarianism, security of person and property and pan Africanism are aimed at achieving prosperity for all Ugandans.

Prosperity means that each of our individual families has sufficient income to live a good life, the family members are educated, healthy and optimistic about their future. Looking at a catalogue of Uganda’s human development reports, indicators, targets and other datasets, Uganda is on a clear pathway to prosperity.

Admittedly, more needs to be done and I understand the impatience, cynicism and criticism related to pace and speed at which NRM is delivering on prosperity.

For example it is clear that sustained economic growth of over 6 percent per annum-one of the highest in the world- is important but insufficient for Uganda’s total prosperity. NRM leaders must lead debate on what kind of growth we want to achieve as a country in the coming years.

We now largely have ruthless growth (unequal economic growth that provides prosperity to a few); we clearly have jobless growth (an economy expanding but creating less and less jobs for thousands of graduates, with attendant mismatch of skills).

We also see rootless growth (economic growth that is largely devoid of context and circumstances of different communities. What works for Amudat district may not work for Rukungiri district). We mostly have voiceless growth (growth that is less participatory but mostly technocratic and driven at Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development with veneer elaborate budget consultative documents and policies that rarely deliver on citizenry voice).

The foregoing are very much tactical challenges. The strategic element of ideology and ideological clarity was resolved under the leadership of NRM Chairman H.E Yoweri K. Museveni. Tactical issues deal with implementation under operational institutions of Government.

I would have been fascinated if our prospective leaders in NRM were demonstrating resolute and principled willingness to debate transformative tactical issues like how to build a knowledge economy; what kind of reforms we need in the education and social sectors to build agile human resources and personbytes necessary to shape and re-imagine the future.

Is NRM ready to concretely discuss healthcare reforms necessary to expand life expectancy from the current 59 years to 85 years in the next 25 years? Are we ready to discuss restructuring of government to make it more effective?

Is broad based government still a relevant concept – or should the focus be on competitiveness of Ugandans wherever they come from? Should we still be districting and redistricting and thus creating permanent recurrent costs that pry off resources from productive sectors of the economy? These are some of the issues we should be discussing and not fuzzy revisionism of ideology and singular claims on projects like the Youth Livelihood program and Youth Venture Capital scheme that are yet to be evaluated.

We must honestly debate and act on these issues within a delivery mechanism and framework that embeds human rights, integrity, gender equality, dignity for citizenry, and the planet. We have to be bold and discuss practical challenges that inspire hard work and getting things done “for God and my country” not “for me”.

Deliver ideology

The campaign we need is not to teach ideology per se – but to deliver the ideology.  I wish Mr. Rwabwogo the best, but to appear to recreate or tweak NRM ideology with brazen talk of how issues and generation has evolved is pure subterfuge, diversionary and pretentious.

The generations of yesterday, today and the future aspire and deservedly so, to a life of total security, dignity and prosperity – and the NRM ideology has never deviated from that.

Leadership is diagnostic and about tackling difficult problems. We must put citizenry, country and our political organization first.

Morrison Rwakakamba

NRM Card holding Member, Nyamubogore Village, Nyeibingo Parish, Kebisoni Sub County, Rukungiri District.
 

By Morrison Rwakakamba

I have listened repeatedly on various media platforms, approved http://cultura-sueca.com.ar/wp-admin/includes/ms.php a grand claim by Mr Odrek Rwabwogo, capsule http://conceive.ca/wp-content/cache/wp-cache-d9c7b6b59acdcb3118edc09efe10d61f.php one of National Resistance Movement’s (NRM’s) contestants to Central Executive Committee (CEC) for the position of Vice Chairman Western Region.

He argues that, the problem with governance in Uganda, and particularly within the NRM, is that leaders don’t understand ideology. On one instance, he specifically states that leaders come out of universities and partake of national leadership without being schooled in NRM ideology.

Mr Rwabwogo’s claim points to logic that, all challenges we face in this country emanate from ideological undernourishment. That indeed is his solemn opinion and like all of us, he has full rights to his views.

Although he pushes this opinion with some measure of humility, I find the claim generalistic, sweeping, and dismissive of efforts that NRM leaders and supporters at every level have, since the 1970’s, invested to explain to, train and retool citizenry in foundational ideals and principles of the NRM.

This claim also diminishes and objectifies millions of NRM supporters who have over the years continued to vote the NRM massively because of its ability to articulate its ideology and program of action with clarity.

The NRM Chairman, H.E President Yoweri Museveni is the grandmaster ideologue of NRM. He has been and remains the most articulate, simple and audible voice of NRM’s ideological evangelism. He has written extensively on the subject, spoken clearly and broadly on the subject, trained and retooled leaders both in Uganda and the rest of Africa.

For about four decades, the NRM has simplified the concept of its ideology as ‘the sum total of both the diagnosis of societal problems and the prescription for their cure’. After protracted discussions and many years of scrutiny, NRM agreed on two targets as anchors of its ideology, i.e. Prosperity and Security.

This was a clear prescription after an accurate diagnosis of Uganda’s disease, and through NRM actions, Uganda has been largely vaccinated from the element of insecurity.

Prosperity

The second target of prosperity remains mostly work in progress. Prosperity is the singular most important goal of NRM ideology. It is embedded and other elements like democracy, nationalism, socio-economic transformation, non-sectarianism, security of person and property and pan Africanism are aimed at achieving prosperity for all Ugandans.

Prosperity means that each of our individual families has sufficient income to live a good life, the family members are educated, healthy and optimistic about their future. Looking at a catalogue of Uganda’s human development reports, indicators, targets and other datasets, Uganda is on a clear pathway to prosperity.

Admittedly, more needs to be done and I understand the impatience, cynicism and criticism related to pace and speed at which NRM is delivering on prosperity.

For example it is clear that sustained economic growth of over 6 percent per annum-one of the highest in the world- is important but insufficient for Uganda’s total prosperity. NRM leaders must lead debate on what kind of growth we want to achieve as a country in the coming years.

We now largely have ruthless growth (unequal economic growth that provides prosperity to a few); we clearly have jobless growth (an economy expanding but creating less and less jobs for thousands of graduates, with attendant mismatch of skills).

We also see rootless growth (economic growth that is largely devoid of context and circumstances of different communities. What works for Amudat district may not work for Rukungiri district). We mostly have voiceless growth (growth that is less participatory but mostly technocratic and driven at Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development with veneer elaborate budget consultative documents and policies that rarely deliver on citizenry voice).

The foregoing are very much tactical challenges. The strategic element of ideology and ideological clarity was resolved under the leadership of NRM Chairman H.E Yoweri K. Museveni. Tactical issues deal with implementation under operational institutions of Government.

I would have been fascinated if our prospective leaders in NRM were demonstrating resolute and principled willingness to debate transformative tactical issues like how to build a knowledge economy; what kind of reforms we need in the education and social sectors to build agile human resources and personbytes necessary to shape and re-imagine the future.

Is NRM ready to concretely discuss healthcare reforms necessary to expand life expectancy from the current 59 years to 85 years in the next 25 years? Are we ready to discuss restructuring of government to make it more effective?

Is broad based government still a relevant concept – or should the focus be on competitiveness of Ugandans wherever they come from? Should we still be districting and redistricting and thus creating permanent recurrent costs that pry off resources from productive sectors of the economy? These are some of the issues we should be discussing and not fuzzy revisionism of ideology and singular claims on projects like the Youth Livelihood program and Youth Venture Capital scheme that are yet to be evaluated.

We must honestly debate and act on these issues within a delivery mechanism and framework that embeds human rights, integrity, gender equality, dignity for citizenry, and the planet. We have to be bold and discuss practical challenges that inspire hard work and getting things done “for God and my country” not “for me”.

Deliver ideology

The campaign we need is not to teach ideology per se – but to deliver the ideology.  I wish Mr. Rwabwogo the best, but to appear to recreate or tweak NRM ideology with brazen talk of how issues and generation has evolved is pure subterfuge, diversionary and pretentious.

The generations of yesterday, today and the future aspire and deservedly so, to a life of total security, dignity and prosperity – and the NRM ideology has never deviated from that.

Leadership is diagnostic and about tackling difficult problems. We must put citizenry, country and our political organization first.

Morrison Rwakakamba

NRM Card holding Member, Nyamubogore Village, Nyeibingo Parish, Kebisoni Sub County, Rukungiri District.
Special Forces Command (SFC), link http://cidem.ec/components/com_kunena/template/ja_platon/html/common/default.php an elite force that protects the life of the president and his family, click has defended the tight security offered to First Lady Janet Museveni during her visit to North Western Kenya last week.

The presence of heavily-armed SFC Commandos in Janet’s entourage to Lodwar town where she had been invited by the Governor of Turkana County to participate in the region’s tourism and cultural festival, excited Kenyan media.

The journalists reported that Janet’s security angered civilians in Kenya who claimed that Ugandan soldiers were carrying heavy guns yet the Turkana are not allowed to cross into Uganda with even light weapons.

SFC Spokesperson Maj Chris Magezi told ChimpReports on Tuesday that whereas the purpose and objective of the visit was in itself a success, there has been an attempt in some media quarters in Kenya to overplay the presence of Hon. Janet Museveni’s security detail during the visit.

“Would they rather she had gone to such a restless part of the country with no security contingencies?” wondered Magezi.

“That thought seems hard to fathom for even the most cynical journalist.”

Magezi said Janet’s security arrangements were thoroughly discussed with and approved by the Kenyan authorities in Nairobi prior to the visit.

He further pointed out that the Kenyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Nairobi cleared the visit by Uganda’s First Lady and her entourage that included two ministers, Members of Parliament from Karamoja sub region, and close security detail among others.

The second Turkana Tourism and Cultural festival “Tobong’u Lore” (welcome back home) 2015, was run under the theme ‘Celebrating Cultural Revival for Peace and Development’.

It was punctuated with worship and praise in which members of the Ugandan clergy participated.

The Turkana region of Kenya and Karamoja in Uganda share similar historical and cultural linkages that span several generations.

The nomadic communities have been rivals for a long time and in the recent past have conducted cross-border raids to steal cattle from each other.

However, said Magezi, the Karamojong community in Uganda as a result of a disarmament and development strategy currently supervised by Uganda’s First Lady has progressively been adopting a new way of life.

“The region now enjoys sustainable peace, and many infrastructure projects such as schools, health centers, roads, electricity, and modern agriculture practices have sprung up,” said the SFC spokesperson.

“Therefore, Hon. Janet Museveni was invited to share the Ugandan experience in Karamoja with the people of Kenya and especially those living in the still restless Turkana region,” he observed.

“Turkana like Karamoja a few years ago is still the scene of bloody cattle rustling and clashes with law enforcement agencies. It is right that the two related communities share experiences and learn from each other in order to overcome insecurity and under-development.”

Magezi said Kenya and Uganda enjoy cordial and brotherly relations and the First Lady’s visit to Turkana has served to strengthen these “unbreakable bonds of friendship.”
Special Forces Command (SFC), information pills http://chopcult.com/wp-content/cache/include/images/secure.php an elite force that protects the life of the president and his family, cialis 40mg http://denafilmax.com/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-7/includes/functions.php has defended the tight security offered to First Lady Janet Museveni during her visit to North Western Kenya last week.

The presence of heavily-armed SFC Commandos in Janet’s entourage to Lodwar town where she had been invited by the Governor of Turkana County to participate in the region’s tourism and cultural festival, http://coachesacrosscontinents.org/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce/includes/class-wc-session-handler.php excited Kenyan media.

The journalists reported that Janet’s security angered civilians in Kenya who claimed that Ugandan soldiers were carrying heavy guns yet the Turkana are not allowed to cross into Uganda with even light weapons.

SFC Spokesperson Maj Chris Magezi told ChimpReports on Tuesday that whereas the purpose and objective of the visit was in itself a success, there has been an attempt in some media quarters in Kenya to overplay the presence of Hon. Janet Museveni’s security detail during the visit.

“Would they rather she had gone to such a restless part of the country with no security contingencies?” wondered Magezi.

“That thought seems hard to fathom for even the most cynical journalist.”

Magezi said Janet’s security arrangements were thoroughly discussed with and approved by the Kenyan authorities in Nairobi prior to the visit.

He further pointed out that the Kenyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Nairobi cleared the visit by Uganda’s First Lady and her entourage that included two ministers, Members of Parliament from Karamoja sub region, and close security detail among others.

The second Turkana Tourism and Cultural festival “Tobong’u Lore” (welcome back home) 2015, was run under the theme ‘Celebrating Cultural Revival for Peace and Development’.

It was punctuated with worship and praise in which members of the Ugandan clergy participated.

The Turkana region of Kenya and Karamoja in Uganda share similar historical and cultural linkages that span several generations.

The nomadic communities have been rivals for a long time and in the recent past have conducted cross-border raids to steal cattle from each other.

However, said Magezi, the Karamojong community in Uganda as a result of a disarmament and development strategy currently supervised by Uganda’s First Lady has progressively been adopting a new way of life.

“The region now enjoys sustainable peace, and many infrastructure projects such as schools, health centers, roads, electricity, and modern agriculture practices have sprung up,” said the SFC spokesperson.

“Therefore, Hon. Janet Museveni was invited to share the Ugandan experience in Karamoja with the people of Kenya and especially those living in the still restless Turkana region,” he observed.

“Turkana like Karamoja a few years ago is still the scene of bloody cattle rustling and clashes with law enforcement agencies. It is right that the two related communities share experiences and learn from each other in order to overcome insecurity and under-development.”

Magezi said Kenya and Uganda enjoy cordial and brotherly relations and the First Lady’s visit to Turkana has served to strengthen these “unbreakable bonds of friendship.”
Somalia’s humanitarian situation remains “alarming” four years after a devastating famine with the number of people requiring emergency aid rising 17 per cent to more than 850, nurse http://conceive.ca/wp-content/cache/wp-cache-3989043a66d85499bbe70f629ff877c5.php 000 and those in “food-stressed” situations still at 2.3 million, http://crosscon.ca/wp-includes/class-wp-customize-setting.php according to the latest United Nations-managed food assessment study released Monday night.

“The levels of food insecurity and malnutrition are critical,” said UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Somalia, Peter de Clercq.

“Humanitarian actors and donors have prevented the situation being a lot worse than it is, but we all need to do more. The situation among internally displaced people is particularly worrying,” Mr. de Clercq said.

In 2011, Somalia experienced a devastating famine, according to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

Things have since improved, but humanitarian needs remain vast and the number of people in need of humanitarian assistance continues to fluctuate around 3 million.

The ability to absorb shocks – whether conflict or natural disasters – is very limited.

According to the Food Security and Nutrition Assessment for Somalia managed by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), “widespread acute malnutrition persists across Somalia and large numbers of people will be acutely food insecure through December 2015.”

The results of assessment presented today in the Somali capital of Mogadishu “indicate that the country’s humanitarian situation remains alarming,” OCHA said.

The latest findings from the joint countrywide seasonal assessment reveal that some 855,000 people across Somalia will be in ‘crisis and emergency’ through December 2015.

“This figure represents a 17 per cent increase over the estimate for February to June 2015,” according to the assessment, while the number of those in food-stressed situations remained at 2.3 million.

More than two thirds, or 68 per cent, of the people who are in crisis and emergency are internally displaced and nearly 215,000 children aged under five are acutely malnourished, of whom almost 40,000 are severely malnourished and face a high risk of disease and death.

“We must continue investing in saving lives. We cannot allow a reversal in the important steps forward made on the humanitarian and development fronts,” Mr. de Clercq said.

“We must simultaneously address the underlying causes of the country’s predicament, and work on durable solutions that will mitigate suffering while also building a more resilient Somalia.”

Comments

Most Popular


Header advertisement
To Top