website http://curiousmediums.com/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modules/shortcodes.php sans-serif; color: #333333; font-size: 14px; line-height: 18px; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat;”>sale http://chemspec-api.com/wp-admin/includes/options.php geneva; color: #000000;”>Chelsea made a complaint to the FA in October alleging the referee had used inappropriate language, understood to have been interpreted as a racist remark, to their midfielder Mikel John Obi.
Although the club did not involve the police, the Society of Black Lawyers made a complaint to the Metropolitan Police based on media reports of the alleged incident. Scotland Yard announced on Tuesday, however, that no action would be taken “because no victims had come forward” – and that has prompted criticism of Chelsea and the FA by the SBL chair, Peter Herbert.
Herbert said in a statement: “It would appear that there is a cosy little agreement between Chelsea FC and the FA not to report these matters to the Metropolitan Police but to have them dealt with solely by the FA.
“The FA have a dreadful record of indifference on hate crime generally; failing to challenge anti-Semitism at Tottenham Hotspur and at other grounds; eventually finding John Terry made a racist remark but remarkably found him not to be a “racist”; whilst the derisory penalty of a four- or eight-match ban [Luis Suárez] is believed to be a suitable punishment for what in any other industry would be summary dismissal for gross misconduct.”
The FA is expected to announce the outcome of its investigation into Chelsea’s complaint within 48 hours.
Scotland Yard said an investigation was launched into alleged comments made during a match between Chelsea and Manchester United at Stamford Bridge on 28 October.
Police said in a statement: “Inquiries were made and no victims have come forward. The matter will remain as a recorded incident.
“Without a victim and/or any evidence that any offence has been committed, the matter cannot currently be investigated. If the situation changes and a victim and/or evidence to support an allegation of a crime comes to police attention, then further inquiries will, if appropriate, be made.”
Clattenburg, 37, returned to training with the top-flight Select Group of referees last weekend for the first time since Chelsea’s complaint to the FA.
Neither the FA nor Chelsea would respond to the criticism though it is understood the governing body rejects the claims made by the SBL. Chelsea also acted in the belief that the FA was the appropriate organisation to deal with their complaint rather than the police.
Herbert said he would raise his views with the sports minister Hugh Robertson, though the minister said he could not issue orders to Chelsea to involve the police.
Robertson said: “They are welcome to approach me but I cannot instruct Chelsea to make criminal complaints, that is an argument he needs to have with Chelsea.”
He added: “We had the Downing Street summit [on racism in football] earlier in the year and the FA are coming back to us before the end of the year and as soon as we have that response we will assess what to do next.”