information pills http://cidem.ec/components/com_kunena/template/ja_platon/html/misc/default.php geneva; font-size: small; mso-bidi-font-family: ‘Times New Roman’; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;”>High ranking officials in the Coordinator of Intelligence Organs Gen. David Tinyefuza’s office have revealed security suspects a possible formation of a new rebel movement in Europe. Recently, army spokesperson Col. Felix Kulayigye said UPDF had the capacity to defeat all forms of internal uprisings and external aggression.
The Uganda Constitution clearly stipulates that for one to be President, one must win majority votes of Ugandans. Using arms to cause regime change is treasonable. Convicts serve a death sentence.
A top military investigator was on Monday dispatched from Kampala to the NRM office in London to follow up clues of subversive activities funded by opposition leaders in diaspora.
“The officer, at the rank of Major, will prepare notes on the debate and why Col. Besigye was invited to address the same gathering alongside Col. Mande, a self-confessed rebel,” a source has a few minutes ago revealed.
During the debate, Col. Samson Mande called for use of arms to overthrow Museveni. Besigye concurred that Museveni can be ousted using arms but the war would “replace him with another dictator.”
He will also investigate a new group under the name Uganda United Pro-Democracy Forum (UUPF) with the view of establishing its contacts, funders and agenda. It’s led by a one Moses Kiwanuka.
The investigating officer will liaise with US military attaché Col. Leopold Kyanda who is said to be coordinating an intelligence network in Europe
Held last weekend under the topic “Uganda At Cross-Roads; which way forward”, the “Grand Debate” gave a war-mongering platform to all and sundry. Security operatives at the function say it was more than a political discussion as several opposition leaders called for war.
Dozens of discussants openly said plans to use war against Museveni must be initiated as soon as possible.
They even pressed Besigye to declare war on Museveni so he could get their support.
At some point, Col. Mande, who fled the UPDF in 2001 to form the rebel Peoples’ Redemption Army, was warmly welcomed and received a deafening applause shortly after his war-speech.
We are told a female security operative with links to Col. Kyanda recorded the proceedings using a smart phone.
The details of the entire debate were later wired to Kampala thus triggering an investigation.
This is not the first time opposition leaders in diaspora are attempting to use arms to overthrow government.
During the 2009 Kayunga riots, a team of army veterans stormed Nateete police station and stole guns which were used to engage security forces thus worsening the situation. The rebels in the city had received funding from a Catholic-owned bank.
In fact, President Yoweri Museveni personally toured the police after getting a brief from Brigadier Burundi of Kakiri that suspected rebels had stolen over 30 guns after defeating police there and torching cars in the compound.
In early 2000s, Col. Noble Mayombo launched a military offensive against PRA hideouts thus capturing several commanders including a top city lawyer. They were being funded by
In 2009, a new group was formed in diaspora to oust Museveni. The rebels were meeting in Sweden and London to mobilise arms and funds. It was nipped in the bud by ESO.
Shortly after Presidential elections this year, Col. Edison Muzoora was found mysteriously dead in Bushenyi. It later emerged that he had been in the country for three months with the view of mobilising former army veterans to wreak havoc. He was to pick guns from Rwenzori and other weapons from Mt. Elgon. He died before his mission could come to fruition.
According to the UUPF’s presentation at the debate, “Ugandan citizens and its well- wishers cannot effectively discuss what is good for the country today and have it implemented under the current regime.”
The group claims: “Criticising government policy is becoming illegal in Uganda, peaceful demonstrations are interpreted as treason and government is trying to enact a law where political discussions have to be authorised by the police.”
The group leader Moses Kiwanuka told the debate: “Resources are so highly misappropriated and unequally distributed such that some of our people have totally lost hope and meaning to life. One cannot engage such a people for meaningful discussions, little wonder many are accepting bribes from the regime as a way of survival.”
He added: “There is potential gov’t sabotage, harassment and intimidation cannot provide a conducive atmosphere for open free discussions on the way forward.”
He concluded that the only option Ugandans have today is to strive and achieve a levelled ground through regime change in order to facilitate meaningful plans and discussions for the way forward for our Nation.
Kiwanuka said: “The regime is extensively weakened today and it is only thriving on intimidation, bribing the people, coercion and a divided army/force.
“Any divisions within the opposition strengthen the incumbent. Foreign perception of Uganda has changed Museveni is no longer that golden boy in the eyes of the international community. Today the whole country at large apart from those linked to the regime is feeling the hitch. People are fed up to such an extent that damage or pain inflicted on the public by gov’t agents be it accidental or otherwise will spark off a people riot. We heard what happened in Tororo where a police car knocked a boda boda man dead and the whole town erupted into riots,” he added.”
Below is Kiwanuka’s presentation
How can we capitalise on the current situation
We commend the efforts done by the opposition including A4C in trying to achieve the above.
In our view in order for progress to be made on this front certain changes need to be embraced.
1. We need to recognise that this is no time for political party, tribal, religious or regional politics. We need a national cause for all citizens to rally behind it. This cause must be inciting, of substance, burning and imminent in nature.
2. There should be no identifiable leader of the revolution in the initial stages otherwise the gov’t will easily curtail the revolution by capturing the leader. A few examples are available from the recent incidents.
3. The organisers must be a fluid group without an office or proper identity i.e. tasks should be allocated to individuals/groups without permanence but on merit.
4. Top mobilisers and role prayers should be individuals/groups without high political offices e.g. MPs and other political party leaders should be followers other than visible organisers because their movements can easily be monitored by the government and thereby restrained.
5. The revolution can be started by mobilising through other non-political but social-economic groups for example boda bodas Assoc, teacher’s assoc, Traders assoc, tax operators etc. However the number of groups should be kept to a minimal for easy of execution and dialogue simplicity.
In light of the above we believe that A4C may be part of the revolution but refrain from leading the mobilisation for reasons mentioned above.
An ideal situation would be a day when a demonstration starts but Dr Besigye stays at home because by coming out to physically participate in the initial days will stifle the revolution when he ends up being out rightly arrested yet by staying home and mobilise his followers to participate could achieve the required persistence.
For progress to be made we need the demonstration to persist for some time which in effect will help to overcome the fear factor within the potential participants hence more people physically joining the cause.
Dealing with hindrances to potential revolution participants
1. On several occasions we have heard people talking about not being able to work or transact business whenever demonstrations are held.
Although it is true that everyone must chip in or be ready to sacrifice, we must come up with a universal rule to help this cause.
One of the ways this can be achieved is by declaring that during the period of demonstrations all commercial or residential landlords will have to forego their rental income hence no one will be expected to pay rent. Organisations like umeme must be treated likewise.
2. Medical facilities: Some element of communal service to this effect needs to be set up in various regions.
3. Provision of water is paramount not only for drinking but also to be used to minimise the tear gas effects.
4. Channels of communication both locally and internationally need to be addressed.
5. Diaspora operation branch for logistical and other purposes would be crucial given the chaotic nature of the demonstration environment which may hinder execution of certain tasks locally.
In summary we suggest that a non-violent revolution is the way forward. In our view a focal, nationalistic rallying point today is the struggle for Uganda’s independence.
Why: Although previous regimes have been corrupt but the current regime’s corruption is unimaginable and we attribute the extent to lack of national interest by the regime, which is not surprising anyway from a foreigner. Uganda has been torn to pieces and evidence can be seen through degradation of schools, hospitals, abolition of cooperatives, our coffee export is now history.
Little wonder recently when Ugandan schools/teachers where craving for funding, they were told that the government had no money yet just in a few days thereafter , the Rwandan National who also doubles to be the Ugandan President donated millions to a school in Rwanda.
Ron Paul in his book The Revolution a Manifesto said “Dictatorial governments encourage racial thinking and undermines individualism because its very existence encourages people to organize along racial lines in order to lobby for benefits for their group.
That lobbying, in turn creates animosity and suspicion among all groups, each of which believes that it is getting less of its fair share than the others. When this happens society gets divided hence empowering the regime in power due to lack of a united opposition”.
Fellow Ugandans let us join together to liberate and regain Uganda’s independence until then will we be able to seat as Ugandans and effectively discuss the best way forward of this project Uganda.
However, security analysts at Chimpreports.com say Museveni is now militarily at his strongest and efforts to wage war on his government would backfire.