Bensouda: We Don't Have Evidence To Prosecute Uhuru At ICC


hospital geneva; font-size: small; line-height: 200%;”>“My decision is based solely on the specific facts of this case devoid of extraneous considerations. As Prosecutor, I have consistently stated my actions and decisions are at all times strictly guided by the evidence in accordance with the Rome Statute legal framework,” said Bensouda in a statement on Thursday night.

Header advertisement

“This recent decision is no different. It is my professional duty to react, and to take the necessary decisions when the state of the evidence changes, as it has in this case,” she added.

Bensouda explained that in the last two months, one of the Prosecution’s key witnesses in the case against Mr. Kenyatta has indicated that he is no longer willing to testify and that more recently, on 4 December 2013, a key second witness in the case confessed to giving false evidence regarding a critical event in the Prosecution’s case.

“This witness has now been withdrawn from the Prosecution witness list. Having carefully considered my evidence and the impact of the two withdrawals, I have come to the conclusion that currently the case against Mr. Kenyatta does not satisfy the high evidentiary standards required at trial,” she added.

“I therefore need time to complete efforts to obtain additional evidence, and to consider whether such evidence will enable my Office to fully meet the evidentiary threshold required at trial.”

The latest development is a victory for the African Union which was opposed to the idea of prosecuting a sitting President and the court’s methods of work that mainly target African leaders.

Kenyan government officials have consistently maintained that the ICC trial is a sham due to lack of evidence to pin President Uhuru and his deputy William Ruto on charges of the 2007 post-election violence.

However, Bensouda said “our pursuit of justice for the victims of the 2007-2008 post-election violence in Kenya has faced many challenges. Notwithstanding, my commitment and that of my staff to the pursuit of justice without fear or favour has remained firm.”

She added: “It is precisely because of our dedication and sense of responsibility to the victims in this case that I have asked the Judges presiding over the case for more time to undertake all remaining steps possible to strengthen the case to ensure justice for the victims.”

“To the people of Kenya, my decision to apply for an adjournment today was not taken lightly and I have explained fully to the Judges the reasons for my exceptional decision. I have and will continue to do all that I can to realise justice for the victims of the 2007-2008 post-election violence.“

It remains unclear if Uhuru’s co-accused; Ruto and broadcaster Sang will survive the ICC hook basing on the lack of evidence at the ICC.


Header advertisement
To Top