Business

EACJ Dismisses Alcon International Limited Dispute

NSSFHH_292005365

see http://cirgroup.com/typo3conf/ext/dam/lib/class.tx_dam_previewerprocbase.php geneva; font-size: small; line-height: 200%;”>Alcon International Limited (K) went to court claiming an award of $8, pharmacy 858,469, with interest and costs, which was made in favor of Alcon International (Uganda) by an arbitrator and adopted by the High Court of Uganda.

The award arose from a contract between the Government of Uganda and Alcon International Limited (K) who later sub-contracted Alcon International Limited (U) to finish the construction of the Workers House building, leading to a dispute about which Alcon Company should be paid for the work done.

Court on Monday said it could not give itself jurisdiction in a case outside its jurisdiction on the ground that it would be for the convenience of the Parties and witnesses.

Also Court found that there was no merit in the reference before it hence dismissed it and ordered that each party to bear their costs.

EACJ First Instance Division had previously dismissed the case by Kenyan construction company, Alcon International (K) Limited, on grounds that the matter was improperly before the Court.

However the Appellate Division noted that the First Instance Division did not in its ruling consider whether it had jurisdiction to entertain the matter, which was a fundamental issue which the Court had to decide on.

The Applicant brought the case to court under article 29 (2) and Article 54 (2) (b) of the protocol on the establishment of the East African Community Common Market of the on protection of Investors across the border, emphasizing that the alleged sister construction company Alcon International Uganda does not exist.

Also the Registrar on Tuesday ruled on a preliminary objection raised by Counsel for the Respondent in a case for costs in an Appeal filed by Alcon International Limited (K) against The Standard Chartered Bank and 2 others.

The Appeal was allowed and they were awarded costs to be taxed by the Registrar. The Registrar ruled that the court was not functus officio (a general rule that, a final decision of a court cannot be reopened) and that he did not make a final decision in this matter when it came up for taxation.

The Registrar ordered that the matter proceeds for taxation and that the parties will be notified of the date.

The East African Court of Justice (EACJ or ‘the Court’), is one of the organs of the East African Community established under Article 9 of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

Established in November 2001, the Court’s major responsibility is to ensure the adherence to law in the interpretation and application of and compliance with the EAC Treaty.

Arusha is the temporary seat of the Court until the Summit determines its permanent seat. The High Courts of the Partner States serve as sub-registries.

Comments

Header advertisement
To Top